Pascal Vranckx, Donald E. Cutlip, Roxana Mehran, Martin B. Leon, Patrick W. Serruys
Updated on May 14, 2021
Structural heart disease includes a heterogeneous group of non-coronary heart diseases where catheter-based interventions have become a feasible therapeutic option in the last decade. Accurate preprocedural evaluation and optimal guidance are crucial to optimise the results and minimise the complications of these procedures. Fluoroscopic and haemodynamic assessments have been the key to guiding percutaneous treatment of structural heart disease. However, the wide spectrum of structural abnormalities and the poor soft-tissue resolution of cine-angiography demand the use of complementary imaging techniques with higher spatial resolution to characterise better the structural lesion and select the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Non-invasive imaging techniques such as echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) are currently considered the foremost imaging tools to diagnose structural heart disease and play a central role in patient selection for percutaneous interventions. In addition, fusion of these imaging technologies (MRI and MDCT) with live x-ray is a promising tool to guide the procedures. Furthermore, novel techniques such as videodensitometric quantitative angiography has been introduced as a potential tool for guidance of aortic and mitral interventions 1, 2
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com
Pascal Vranckx, Donald E. Cutlip, Roxana Mehran, Martin B. Leon, Patrick W. Serruys
Updated on May 14, 2021
Tassilo Bonzel, Christian W. Hamm, Volker Schächinger, Gerhard Strupp, Didier Tchetche
Updated on August 23, 2018
Pascal Vranckx, Donald E. Cutlip, Roxana Mehran, Martin B. Leon, Patrick W. Serruys
Updated on May 12, 2023