Objective
to report the clinical efficacy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) compared to Computed Tomography (CT) to guide TAVR
Study
investigator-initiated prospective randomised non-inferiority trial (margin 9%)
Population
patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis
Endpoints
valve with proper performance at discharge
Conclusion
CMR-guided TAVR was non-inferior to CT-guided TAVR
Reindl et al. Circulation. 2023;148:1220-1230