Objective
to compare edoxaban with Vitamin K antagonists in patients with prevalent or incidental atrial fibrillation as the indication for oral anticoagulation after TAVI
Study
multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial
Population
post TAVI patients
Endpoints
primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adverse events consisting of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis or major bleeding. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f121/4f1216ff8a353e0afbe355b9e91fdc3c1ce4f7f3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fdb7/8fdb70b903868cdb15f738643cb1e6445d85d9d1" alt=""
Conclusion
in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent successful TAVI, edoxaban was non inferior to vitamin K antagonists for a composite primary outcome of adverse clinical events. The incidence of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with vitamin K antagonists
Van Mieghem et al. N Engl J Med. 2021