Objective
to compare the outcomes of cardiac catheterisation vs transradial or trans femoral access and standard vs ultrasound guided arterial access
Study
prospective single-centre, randomised trial: 2Ã2 factorial (radial vs femoral and standard vs ultrasound)
Population
unselected patients : angiography only (77.4% vs 72.9%) and PCI (22.5% vs 27.1%)
Endpoints
composite of ACUITY: major bleeding and MACE (death, stroke, MI, urgent TLR) and vascular complications at 30 days
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00aed/00aed454489a905e1d45e22f22cb4b6bf07f2fe9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/335e9/335e928d1ad2a58d6943d100ab4a2e402c390e0d" alt=""
Conclusion
transradial access was associated with a significant reduction in complications compared to the femoral access
Nguyen et al. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:e522-3