Objective
to report the 5-year clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (Sapiens XT value system)
Study
prospective, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority study
Population
patients with severe aortic stenosis and intermediate surgical risk (predicted surgical mortality of 4% to 8% at 30 days)
Endpoints
death from any cause or disabling stroke
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33eef/33eeff0fda970ebbe35af0a52be5e7dcf1d292ca" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19893/1989342c78f757666b8f7b76c81f22b6d95fdfca" alt=""
Conclusion
there was no significant difference of 5-year rate of death or disabling stroke between surgery or TAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk
Makkar et al. N Eng J Med. 2020;382:799-809