Objective
to determine the clinical benefits of IVUS guidance compared to angiography guidance during DES implantation
Study
prospective multicentre randomised study
Population
all-comers
Endpoints
target vessel failure: cardiac death, TV-MI and clinically driven target-vessel revascularisation at 12 months
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4a11/e4a112e80b6cbad36016b4b08e493c7791f343fb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e4db/9e4dbf498bc41d017a79cc57dc781262fa67f10e" alt=""
Conclusion
IVUS-guided DES implantation improved clinical outcome at 12 months compared with angiography guided DES implantation
Zhang et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:3126-37